Novel obsessions Tuesday, Jun 26 2007
General 7:33 pm
I’m wondering what people think about the conversation in Don Quixote between the canon and the priest in chapters 47-48. The canon at times seems very logical and at other times inconsistent. He criticizes novels of chivalry as “foolish stories meant only to delight and not to teach, unlike moral tales, which delight and teach at the same time.” And yet he says that he has read the beginning of almost every chivalric novel that’s been written. He can’t read to the end of any of them, though, because their plots are so repetitive. So why does he keep beginning them over and over?
In spite of being so critical of chivalric novels, he can’t seem to let them go:
Despite all the bad things [the canon] had said about those books, he found one good thing in them, which was the opportunity for display that they offered a good mind, providing a broad and spacious field where one’s pen could write unhindered, describing shipwrecks, storms, skirmishes, and battles …
and the canon goes on for a long paragraph listing all the wonderful things a writer of chivalric novels can write about. He ends his long speech describing how fabulous a chivalric novel could be if only people wrote them well:
And if this is done in a pleasing style and with ingenious invention, and is drawn as close as possible to the truth, it no doubt will weave a cloth composed of many different and beautiful threads, and when it is finished, it will display such perfection and beauty that it will achieve the great goal of any writing, which, as I have said, is to teach and delight at the same time. Because the free writing style of these books allows the author to show his skills as an epic, lyric, tragic, and comic writer, with all the characteristics contained in the sweet and pleasing sciences of poetry and rhetoric; for the epic can be written in prose as well as verse.
He’s so convinced the genre of chivalric novel can be saved, that he has tried to write one of his own and has written more than a hundred pages.
The canon sees so much potential in this genre that he seems obsessed with it. And I can’t help but think of Don Quixote itself when I read the last sentence of the above quotation — Don Quixote has its own “free writing style” that combines epic, lyric, tragic, and comic aspects, with a little poetry and rhetoric and a lot of prose. Is Cervantes speaking through the canon here, working his way toward the new genre that the novel will be?

June 26, 2007 at 8:54 pm
I would have to agree with your last comment, that Cervantes is speaking through the canon. I keep thinking he is delivering exactly what he finds so lacking in the chivalric novel. I guess what is interesting to me is Don Quixote himself is a personification of the chivalric tale — the hero, in this case, “providing a broad and spacious field where one’s pen could write unhindered, describing shipwrecks, storms, skirmishes, and battles,” versus the genre itself.
June 27, 2007 at 11:13 pm
That’s great, LK, DQ as a chivalric tale himself … he sort of gets collapsed with the text itself.
July 9, 2007 at 3:25 pm
I (shamefully) haven’t got to this bit yet and can’t remember my thoughts on my first go-round at DQ. I’ll be back to comment when I reach it.
July 9, 2007 at 8:01 pm
No rush!
July 28, 2007 at 3:45 pm
I am just starting this wonderful, LONG, novel, so it will be awhile before I catch up. I recently read a book about the war between the West and the Ottoman Empire in the 1570’s. Cervantes fought in this war.